• Through the dynamics of the counter-plot, the similes reassure us of what Hartman calls the "graceful coexistence of free will and divine providence."

    从这个反计的整个催动力来看,这些比喻向我们再次确认了被哈特曼称为,“自由意志和神圣天意华丽的共存“的结合“

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • Hartman's absolutely right to insist that no theological concept is as important to Paradise Lost as free will on the one hand and divine providence on the other.

    哈特曼有绝对的权利坚持说任何神学的概念,在中的意义都不足与匹敌自由意志的重要性,也不足以和神圣的天命相比。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • Even if something that did have free will would have to be non-physical, it wouldn't follow that we're non-physical.

    即使某些有自由意志的东西,必然是非物质的,那也推不出来我们是非物质的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • None. When you walk through that door it's an act of free will, and I will not have anything other than complete silence.

    走过那道门,是你的自由,我不会做其他事,除非保持安静。

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • God learned immediately after creating this unique being, that he will exercise his free will against God.

    上帝在创造了这种独特的生命后马上意识到,他们将会以自由意志违抗上帝。

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • For instance, when we deal with one another in a legal and a moral setting, we think in terms of free will and responsibility.

    举个例子,当我们在一套法律和道德系统中,与其他人相处时,我们会从自由意志和责任的角度进行思考

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • And intuitively, it seems plausible to many people that you couldn't have free will and be subject to determinism.

    从直觉上讲,对于很多人来说,你不可能既有自由意志又服从于决定论

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Even though God knew exactly what Adam and Eve would do -that they would eat the fruit -we still have to be able to say that they ate the fruit freely out of their own free will.

    甚至可以说上帝完全了解亚当夏娃接下来要做的,-他们会去偷吃禁果,-我们还是可以这样说的,他们处于自由的想法之下,偷吃了禁果。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • This is the pulsating vehicle for his precious theology of free will and for his politics of liberty.

    这是他宝贵的自由意志神学观点和,推崇自由的政治主张的充满活力的载体。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • But we've got free will, so there's got to be something more to us than just being a physical object.

    而人有自由意志,所以在我们身上有着,超越物理实体的特质

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Give up the conclusion that we've got-- Give up the premise that "We've got free will," it won't follow that we're non-physical.

    放弃我们已得到的结论,放弃"我们有自由意志"这个前提,就不能推出我们是非物质的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It's an everyday occurrence that we can think and reason and feel and be creative, or choose otherwise and have free will.

    我们能思考推理,感知创造,或能做出不同的选择,拥有自由意志,都是每天存在的事

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • The fact that we've got free will is something that most of us take for granted about ourselves.

    我们拥有自由意志这一事实,被大多数人认为理所应当

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It follows, if nothing subject to determinism has free will, but we have free will, it follows that we're not subject to determinism.

    得到结论,如果任何遵守决定论的实体,都没有自由意志,但我们有自由意志,那就表明我们不遵守决定论

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • You put these things together and you get the conclusion that we, since we've got free will, can't be a purely physical object.

    综上所述 你就能得到这样的结论,由于我们有自由意志,所以不可能是纯粹的物理对象

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • No physical object that's subject to determinism could have free will, so we don't have free will.

    而遵循决定论的物理实体,是没有自由意志的,所以人没有自由意志

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定