So this we would want to delete in order for the code not to run the risk of crashing, but let's now see this was made by an excellent teacher out at Stanford University.

我要按顺序删除它，不要冒崩溃的风险,但是这个是由一个来自斯坦福大学的,优秀教师做的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

and delete her voicemail messages so as that they could record more and listen to them all.

删除她的语音留言，这样他们就能记录更多，而且听到所有的语音。

新闻社的真实事件 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So let's be careful here, we're not saying that we're going to delete the voters at 1, or delete the voters at 10, though we might wish to.

我们需要注意的是,我们并没有说要剔除立场1,或者立场10的选票,虽然我们希望能这样

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I'm going to delete that arrow and actually draw s2 as pointing to this chunk of memory because whereas before this sequence of chars might have lived at address 71 or whatever, well, this one might live at 91.

我不会把那个箭头删除，实际上我画了s2作为,这块内存的指针，因为,这个字符序列存储在地址71或其它的地方，这个可能存储在91的地方。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

We can look at it here; we looked at append, which added things to lists, we looked at delete, deleting things from a list.

看看这儿，append方法给数组，增加了一些内容，我们还学习了，如何删除数组中的元素。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

These strategies I'm about to delete, it isn't that they're never best responses, they were best responses to things, but the things they were best responses to, are things that are never going to be played, so they're irrelevant.

我现在剔除掉的策略,他们并非不是最佳对策,他们是某些情况下的最佳对策,但是使他们成为最佳对策的条件,是不会发生的,所以它们就不成立

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And if I did this, and again, don't scribble too much in your notes but if we just make it clear what's going on here, I'm actually going to delete these strategies since they're never going to be played I end up with a little box again.

如果我再进行一次,别在笔记上乱画,我们只是想知道最后会怎样,因为这些策略不会被人采用,所以我剔除掉它们,最后我得到了一个更小的方格

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Okay, so if we had stopped the class after the first week where all we learned to do was to delete dominated strategies, we'd be stuck, we'd have nothing to say about this game and as I said before, this is the most important game, so that would be bad news for Game Theory.

好了,如果我们只学了第一周的内容,即如果我们只学到了剔除劣势策略的话,我们没招了,我们无法解释这个博弈,但我之前说了,这是个很重要的博弈,这对博弈论来说可不是个好消息

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Delete those. Delete those for everyone else, because everyone else is not going to play a dominated strategy.

应该剔除它们,其他人也会这么做,因为其他人也不会,采用劣势策略

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So Christine is correct in saying that once we delete the strategies 1 and 10 once we realize that those positions are not going to be chosen by our sophisticated candidates then we realize that probably choosing 2 isn't a good idea either.

克里斯汀说的很对,一旦我们剔除了策略1和10,一旦我们意识到,不会有人选择这些立场时,我们会发现,选立场2或9可能也不是个好主意了

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

One tip about this, try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players before you delete, then delete.

这里有一个窍门,在剔除之前试着找出,所有参与人的劣势策略,然后再剔除它们

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Delete those lines of code and move them up to the top and problem solved.

把这几行代码删除，然后把它们放到,前面去，问题就解决了。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Try to identify all the dominated strategies of all players again, and then delete.

再次寻找所有,参与人的劣势策略,再剔除它们

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选