This effort to establish what it calls "deterrent punishments" for shariah slander is only one example of OIC activity at odds with American interests and the U.S. Constitution.
Should they actually accept that, for example, the nominee's "belief in a strong nuclear deterrent" is so firmly held that he will actually oppose President Obama's further efforts in a second term - in which he has "more flexibility" - to denuclearize the world starting with our arsenal?