• The Hobbesian citizen is not likely to be a risk taker, like a George Washington or an Andrew Carnegie.

    可以这样说,霍布斯笔下的公民是不可能做冒险家的,就像乔治·华盛顿和安德鲁·卡内基一样。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • And that is not likely to be the case if it's the person who is nearby. Right?

    这和我们说的,近距离产生爱情不是一回事儿?

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • Obviously the algorithm is likely to depend on the size of the input, so this is not a great idea.

    很明显这个算法是与我的,输入的大小相关的,因此这不是个好方法。

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Is not any so-called list of great thinkers ? or great texts likely to be simply arbitrary and tell us more about what such a ! list excludes than what it includes?

    这种所谓的伟大思想家,或巨著清单不会太过于武断吗,它告诉我们的应是,遗漏多于涵蕴吧?

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • This is a problem when you consider that books in the days were not likely to be codices as they are today, but scrolls that took up quite a lot of space.

    这里有点奇怪,因为考虑到那个时期的书本,和现在我们看到的抄本不同,是比较占地方的卷轴

    耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

  • The person is not likely to say, "Oh, I bet it's love."

    我朋友不太可能说,,“我猜是爱“

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • But what seems likely is the sort of phobias you're likely to have does not have much to do with your personal history but rather it has a lot to do with your evolutionary history.

    但你可能患有的恐怖症,似乎与你的个人经历无关,而与人类进化史有着很大的关系。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定