The Hobbesian citizen is not likely to be a risk taker, like a George Washington or an Andrew Carnegie.
可以这样说,霍布斯笔下的公民是不可能做冒险家的,就像乔治·华盛顿和安德鲁·卡内基一样。
And that is not likely to be the case if it's the person who is nearby. Right?
这和我们说的,近距离产生爱情不是一回事儿?
Obviously the algorithm is likely to depend on the size of the input, so this is not a great idea.
很明显这个算法是与我的,输入的大小相关的,因此这不是个好方法。
Is not any so-called list of great thinkers ? or great texts likely to be simply arbitrary and tell us more about what such a ! list excludes than what it includes?
这种所谓的伟大思想家,或巨著清单不会太过于武断吗,它告诉我们的应是,遗漏多于涵蕴吧?
This is a problem when you consider that books in the days were not likely to be codices as they are today, but scrolls that took up quite a lot of space.
这里有点奇怪,因为考虑到那个时期的书本,和现在我们看到的抄本不同,是比较占地方的卷轴
The person is not likely to say, "Oh, I bet it's love."
我朋友不太可能说,,“我猜是爱“
But what seems likely is the sort of phobias you're likely to have does not have much to do with your personal history but rather it has a lot to do with your evolutionary history.
但你可能患有的恐怖症,似乎与你的个人经历无关,而与人类进化史有着很大的关系。
应用推荐