Last week, we discussed one problem for medical journals: the question of authorship.

VOA: special.2009.10.08

So that at least,they claimed for some that through these texts that they wanted apostolic authorship or close to apostolic authorship.

所以至少有些人认为,这些书需要是使徒所著,或者亲近使徒的人所著。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

Apostolic authorship was one thing they talk about.

使徒著述才是他们的考虑标准。

耶鲁公开课 - 新约课程节选

You might conclude that these features are evidence of multiple authorship a good deal of revision which points itself to a kind of composite structure different layers maybe, different sources.

所以这些特点会让你认为有很多作者,很多次的修改,会让结构看起来世合并而成的,不同的层次，不同的素材。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

I want you to draw some conclusions about its authorship and the way it was compiled or composed." And so you pick it up and you start reading and you notice features like this.

关于作者的身份，以及创作的方式,做一个总结,带着这些问题，开始读书的时候，你会发现这样的特点。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

And that's a difference in authorship. So if you look, for example, at the prologue to the laws of Ur-nammu: An and Enlil gave kingship to Ur-nammu, but Ur-nammu is said to establish equity and the laws.

这是由作者决定的差别，例如，在吾珥南模法典的，序言里提到，安努和恩利勒将王位传给了吾珥南模,但据说是吾珥南模建立了衡平法和这部法典。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

What might you conclude about its authorship or manner of composition?

你如何总结作者和创作方式？

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

Right? Multiple authorship. Yeah?

很多作者？

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

Now his work created a sensation. It undermined of course traditional claims about the authorship of God and the work of Moses. It's still disputed by conservative groups and Roman Catholic authorities, although Roman Catholic scholars certainly teach it and adopt it.

他的作品引起了轰动，当然，它削弱了传统的关于,摩西是”上帝“这个称呼和《律法》的作者的主张,尽管天主教学者也会接受并传授他的作品，但它仍然在保守派和罗马天主教当局中备受争议。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

So Greenberg, and since him, Brettler, and many others, have argued that the principle of divine authorship has certain very important implications. First, it has a significant effect on the scope of the law.

所以Greenberg和他之后的Brettler以及其他很多学者,都认为，作者身份的神圣性原则有某些意义重大的,含意，首先，它对法律的适用范围有重要影响。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选